According to @stocktalkweekly, the 16-stock portfolio spans issuer market caps from $2.4T down to $185M based on the provided values 2.4T, 1.5T, 122B, 24B, 13B, 12.3B, 11B, 10B, 5.4B, 4.8B, 4.5B, 4.2B, 1.5B, 1.3B, 1.1B, and 185M, source: @stocktalkweekly. Counts by size bracket are 2 at $1T+, 6 between $10B and $122B, 4 between $4B and $5.4B, 3 between $1.1B and $1.5B, and 1 at $185M, source: @stocktalkweekly. The median issuer size is approximately $7.7B, calculated as the average of $5.4B and $10B, and the aggregate issuer market caps total about $4.115T, calculated from the provided figures, source: @stocktalkweekly. This distribution includes both very large and very small issuers, a mix that is directly relevant for liquidity-aware execution planning based on the stated market-cap profile, source: @stocktalkweekly.

According to Compounding Quality on Twitter, Warren Buffett emphasized that the size of a company, whether large cap, mid cap, small cap, or micro cap, is irrelevant to his investment decisions. Instead, Buffett focuses on understanding the business, evaluating the management team, and ensuring the price is attractive (source: @QCompounding, June 17, 2025). For crypto and stock traders, this approach highlights the importance of fundamental analysis over market capitalization. In the context of cryptocurrencies, traders should apply similar principles—prioritizing project fundamentals, team credibility, and valuation—over simply following high-cap tokens. This mindset can help identify undervalued crypto assets and optimize portfolio returns.